What Nigeria Can Learn from Tajikistan’s Fear of Religious Extremism**
**Stability by Force, Freedom by Fire:
What Nigeria Can Learn from Tajikistan’s Fear of Religious Extremism**
By Sights and Sounds of Ndon-Eyo II
History does not punish nations the same way.
Some are punished with chaos.
Others with silence.
Nigeria and Tajikistan are two countries that walked through civil war, tasted blood, and survived. Yet, standing today, they made opposite choices—and now live with opposite consequences.
Where Nigeria chose freedom at all costs, Tajikistan chose order at all costs.
Where Nigeria allowed religion to flourish publicly, Tajikistan locked religion behind the walls of the state.
One is noisy, divided, and bleeding.
The other is quiet, controlled, and tense.
The question is no longer who is right—
but who is learning from history, and who is repeating it.
Two Civil Wars, Two National Traumas
Nigeria’s civil war (1967–1970) taught the country a single lesson:
No group must ever dominate the others again.
Federalism, religious freedom, ethnic balancing—these became Nigeria’s survival tools. The state loosened its grip and trusted society.
Tajikistan’s civil war (1992–1997) taught a very different lesson:
Never allow ideology—especially religious ideology—to challenge the state again.
The war began as a power struggle but quickly absorbed Islamist movements, regional militias, and foreign influences. When it ended, over 100,000 were dead. The government decided: never again.
That decision still shapes Tajikistan today.
Religion: Nigeria’s Loud Faith vs Tajikistan’s Silent Islam
Nigeria wears religion on its sleeve.
Churches broadcast miracles on television.
Mosques influence voting patterns.
Pastors and Imams are political actors, not just spiritual guides.
This freedom created vibrant faith, yes—but it also created unguarded space for radicalization.
Case Study 1: Boko Haram (Nigeria)
Boko Haram did not rise overnight.
It grew quietly:
- Preaching unchecked
- Exploiting poverty
- Weaponizing grievance
- Recruiting youths long before bombs exploded
The Nigerian state reacted too late, because it feared appearing anti-religion. By the time force was applied, ideology had already hardened.
The cost?
- Tens of thousands dead
- Millions displaced
- Northern Nigeria traumatized
- Military stretched thin
Freedom delayed discipline—and discipline arrived only after devastation.
Case Study 2: Central Asian Jihadism (Tajikistan)
Tajikistan took the opposite path.
- Religious parties were banned
- Clerics were licensed by the state
- Children barred from mosques
- Political Islam crushed early
Harsh? Yes.
Effective? Also yes.
Radical groups exist—but underground, fragmented, and weak. There is no Boko Haram equivalent roaming Tajik villages. Extremism is prevented, not negotiated.
The price?
- Religious resentment
- Suppressed expression
- A constant tension beneath the surface
But blood is not flowing.
The Nigerian Paradox
Nigeria is constitutionally secular—but practically religious.
Politicians kneel in churches and mosques.
Policies fear clerical backlash.
Security agencies hesitate until violence becomes undeniable.
We defend freedom of worship so fiercely that we forget a basic truth:
Every freedom without boundaries becomes a weapon in the wrong hands.
Nigeria did not fail because it allowed religion.
Nigeria failed because it refused to regulate religion until it was too late.
What Nigeria Can Learn from Tajikistan (Without Becoming a Police State)
Nigeria does not need Tajikistan’s repression.
But it desperately needs Tajikistan’s foresight.
1. Early Intervention Beats Late Warfare
Tajikistan crushed extremist ideology at the preaching stage.
Nigeria waited for bombs.
👉 Nigeria must regulate sermons that incite violence—before they radicalize.
2. The State Must Be Stronger Than the Pulpit
In Tajikistan, no Imam or cleric is above the state.
In Nigeria, too many are untouchable.
👉 No religious leader should command more loyalty than the constitution.
3. Poverty Is Fuel, But Ideology Is the Spark
Nigeria often blames poverty alone.
Tajikistan learned ideology must be controlled alongside economics.
👉 Job creation without ideological regulation is incomplete security.
4. Neutrality Is Not Cowardice
Tajikistan is brutal in neutrality—no religion, no sect, no ideology challenges state authority.
Nigeria often chooses appeasement over neutrality.
👉 The state must offend extremists early to protect the innocent later.
The Danger on Both Sides
Let us be clear.
- Tajikistan risks explosion through repression
- Nigeria risks collapse through indulgence
One may one day face revolt.
The other is already facing insurgency.
The solution lies between both extremes.
Final Reflection
Nigeria prides itself on freedom.
Tajikistan prides itself on stability.
But history shows that unchecked freedom can burn a nation, and unchecked control can suffocate it.
The wise country learns from others’ scars—not just its own.
Nigeria must stop pretending that regulation is oppression.
Tajikistan must remember that silence is not peace.
And the rest of us must ask:
Are we protecting faith—or are we sacrificing lives in its name?
— Sights and Sounds of Ndon-Eyo II
11
Comments
Post a Comment